MegaVote: SC 1st, 1/31/2011

Recent Congressional Votes Senate: Secret Holds Elimination House: Non-Security Discretionary Spending Limit House: Presidential Campaign Fund Termination Upcoming Congressional Bills Senate: FAA Air Transportation Modernization and Safety Improvement Act Editor's Note: The House is in recess until Tuesday, February 8, 2011.

Recent Senate Votes

Secret Holds Elimination - Vote Agreed to (92-4, 4 Not Voting) The Senate spent much of the week debating procedural rules. One of the rule changes the chamber passed was this one that ends the practice of “secret holds,” where a senator anonymously blocks legislation or a nomination. The rule change requires a senator to notify his or her party leader within 2 days of placing a hold. Sen. Lindsey Graham voted YES......send e-mail or see bio Sen. Jim DeMint voted NO......send e-mail or see bio

Recent House Votes

Non-Security Discretionary Spending Limit - Vote Passed (256-165, 13 Not Voting) The House approved this resolution directing the chair of the Budget Committee to reduce non-security spending to 2008 levels for the remainder of the 2011 fiscal year. The Budget Committee sets spending levels but does not appropriate funds. The continuing resolution currently funding government operations expires on March 4, 2011. Rep. Tim Scott voted YES......send e-mail or see bio Presidential Campaign Fund Termination - Vote Passed (239-160, 35 Not Voting) The House voted to end a program put in place in 1976 that provides taxpayer funds to presidential candidates and the major parties for their nominating conventions. The bill's future in the Senate is unclear. Rep. Tim Scott voted YES......send e-mail or see bio

Upcoming Votes

FAA Air Transportation Modernization and Safety Improvement Act - S.223 The Senate is scheduled to take up this bill reauthorizing the Federal Aviation Administration.

Jim DeMint's Votes For 01/10/2011 - 01/29/2011

Jan 27, 2011 - Senate Vote

S.Res. 21: A resolution to amend the Standing Rules of the Senate to provide procedures for extended debate. (On the Resolution)

Resolution Rejected 46-49, 5 not voting (2/3 required). 91% of Democrats supporting, 100% of Republicans opposing.

Sen. DeMint [R-SC]: Nay

Go to Bill Status: S.Res. 21: A resolution to amend the Standing Rules of the Senate to provide procedures for extended debate.

Jan 27, 2011 - Senate Vote

S.Res. 10: A resolution to improve the debate and consideration of legislative matters and nominations in the Senate. (On the Resolution)

Resolution Rejected 44-51, 5 not voting (2/3 required). 87% of Democrats supporting, 100% of Republicans opposing.

Sen. DeMint [R-SC]: Nay

Go to Bill Status: S.Res. 10: A resolution to improve the debate and consideration of legislative matters and nominations in the Senate.

Jan 27, 2011 - Senate Vote

S.Res. 8: A resolution amending the Standing Rules of the Senate to provide for cloture to be invoked with less than a three-fifths majority after additional debate. (On the Resolution)

Resolution Rejected 12-84, 4 not voting (2/3 required). Bipartisan opposition.

Sen. DeMint [R-SC]: Nay

Go to Bill Status: S.Res. 8: A resolution amending the Standing Rules of the Senate to provide for cloture to be invoked with less than a three-fifths majority after additional debate.

Jan 27, 2011 - Senate Vote

S.Res. 29: A resolution to permit the waiving of the reading of an amendment if the text and adequate notice are provided. (On the Resolution)

Resolution Agreed to 81-15, 4 not voting (3/5 required). Bipartisan support.

Sen. DeMint [R-SC]: Nay

Go to Bill Status: S.Res. 29: A resolution to permit the waiving of the reading of an amendment if the text and adequate notice are provided.

Jan 27, 2011 - Senate Vote

S.Res. 28: A resolution to establish as a standing order of the Senate that a Senator publicly disclose a notice of intent to objecting to any measure or matter. (On the Resolution)

Resolution Agreed to 92-4, 4 not voting (3/5 required). Bipartisan support.

Sen. DeMint [R-SC]: Nay

Go to Bill Status: S.Res. 28: A resolution to establish as a standing order of the Senate that a Senator publicly disclose a notice of intent to objecting to any measure or matter.

Jan 26, 2011 - Senate Vote

S.Res. 14: A resolution honoring the victims and heroes of the shooting on January 8, 2011 in Tucson, Arizona. (On the Resolution)

Resolution Agreed to 97-0, 3 not voting. Bipartisan support.

Sen. DeMint [R-SC]: Yea

Go to Bill Status: S.Res. 14: A resolution honoring the victims and heroes of the shooting on January 8, 2011 in Tucson, Arizona.

Farewell, Citizens' Report

(This below was posted at Marty Tennant's website, The Citizens' Report.)

The time has come to say what I wanted to accomplish here is never going to happen. The bright side, however, is it has in plenty other places. My blog, a few sites I write for and other places on the Web I leave comments. It's called being real.

There was a time when I did go by an alias. I was afraid of people knowing who I was. But there comes a time when you grow up, get over the fears and go full frontal. So, I did. Ever since then I posted under my real name, took the hits that came and dished it back tenfold.

I was eventually asked during the past mayoral election to moderate this board because I was someone Marty trusted. For that, I extend a gracious hand because I really enjoyed the experience.

Though there is a disease that exists here. And until Marty shows me, I'll always believe a couple people here make it look like there are six or seven. These hidden people are dragging this board down. Specifically with their fixation on me. A few others agree.

I am not an elected official. I don't hold any office, but I manage to garner some of the most hateful diatribe here - from hidden persons. I am somewhat honored with the attention. I don't have to run for office in this state or county and I get talked about as if I have been an incumbent for decades.

When I was Georgetown Democrat, I went after those I disagreed with. I played with name association. I concede the fact I did it. However, when I started using my real name the disagreements and challenges didn't cease. I eventually started my own blog - with more freedom.

But notice who I go after. Elected officials. Politics. Issues. Regulation. It's all there. I do not, however, start my stories or my columns in the Georgetown Times as if I am at a gasoline station. I use facts. I study extensively. I research my information.

Lately, I have become a newsmaker rather than a news reporter. The anonymous people here can be credited with that. I suppose they think they can talk about me so much I'll get fed up and just run away - never to speak or write again.

Wrong. I told myself that when I went back to work I would become even more involved. Even more opinionated. And I will. I have.

The one thing that has changed, though, is my dealings with no-names. As written recently, I will not respond to people who can't use a real name AND have the common decency to say something to me similar to what they write.

Guess what? No takers. Not one person has said they post here AND post against me. Not one person has called me "Shamderson" to my face. Not one person, I tell you.

I wanted to accomplish my goal - getting people who run me down here to do it publicly to my face. In essence, that means the fact I will speak back. The mere satisfaction no-names have is they can write - and run.

Marty has information on Ron Charlton about his children. The difference between the way he handles discussions about the subject and no-names doing the same is the fact no-names are scared to do it publicly.

That's what it's about, isn't it. Being scared. Scared of me? I don't see why. I don't have any power. It's been said by no-names here. Why don't they believe what they write.

As soon as the no-names here found out I moderated this board, they ran to Marty thinking I had access to IP addresses. Why so scared?

No matter. The recent post by the yet-another-name person, ripping comments between Tom Swatzel and I, show I am the focus of others. I am their wet dream.

Tom Swatzel has a set. It's unfortunate the no-names here don't.

I couldn't care less. I am done here. There's nothing to accomplish. I have succeeded in having what I write elsewhere showing up here. There's no need to post here. It's done by trolls.

And others are just as fed up. They can't stand coming to this site and seeing the "Shamderson" show. Hell, Marty had to devote a section just to the steel mill to get the ranting and raving off the popular section.

I really want Marty to know I appreciate his medium. He's a great guy. Personally, he's a chip off the old block. Politically, we agree and disagree respectfully and professionally.

As for the no-names here, they may think they have "won" a battle or whatever. They haven't. I stopped posting here a while back. I have more important items in my life to focus on - other than what no-name copied what I said somewhere else. Plus, more material will be available for you all to copy really soon - if you can get over the fear of me "phishing for email addresses."  

So, have fun no-names. Tear this up. Run me down. You won't do it to my face. That, my little no-names, is my satisfaction.  

This is the end... for now. Marty, I do hope one day you require real names of real people who continually run others down that do use their real names.

Thanks. And you're welcome you no-names.  

Jill Kelso forced to apologize?

It looks like Karen Floyd got her way after all.

Georgetown County Republican Jill Kelso was to bring a resolution up at a state GOP executive meeting reprimanding Floyd following a recent private meeting the chairwoman held with Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour — a potential 2012 presidential candidate — and other top area activists and donors.

A source attending the meeting says the "frank discussion" between Kelso and Lanneau Sigling, a state executive committee member from Charleston, produced a "forced" apology. The source also says the apology wasn't "easily agreed upon." An e-mail has been sent to Kelso for confirmation.

“Sometimes, well-meaning members get excited or don’t get their questions answered properly, and they get frustrated,” Sigling said. “Jill’s motives, she said they were pure, and I believe her. We had a group hug, and it’s time to move on. It’s all about electing conservatives.”

I suppose wanting to do the right thing and bring, oh.my.gosh., transparency to the Republicans is frowned upon - majorly.

S.C. Republicans want no transparency for attack advertisements

Let it be known that all South Carolina Republican congressmen want to keep groups producing television attack ads, those people say that annoy them the most, protected from transparency.

A Democratic measure was presented to add requirements for campaign-finance transparency to HR 359.

Republicans are all in favor for not wanting taxpayers to fund - voluntarily - presidential campaigns and nominating conventions via the use of federal tax returns. However, they want to shield millionaires and billionaires who fund television attack ads. So, who are they protecting. Not you, of course.

A yes vote, which Rep. James Clyburn casted, was to require TV attack ads and other campaign spots to identify the corporation, union or foreign government paying for it.

I suppose it's great for Republicans to tout transparency in government, but to hell with who supports their election bids.

S.C. Republicans vote to send jobs overseas

Every South Carolina Republican congressman voted to send U.S. jobs abroad.

Democratic members of Congress decided to use H Res 38, the beginning of Republican budget cuts (federal spending), to force the hand on how serious they were on producing jobs here in the United States. They aren't.

The S.C. GOP congressmen  voted to allow federal contracts to any company that the Department of Labor finds to be outsourcing jobs. Democrats, however, were against this. Rep. James Clyburn voted no.

Jill Kelso making state GOP rumblings

Seeing the fact these Republicans can't do anything for the greater good of the people in the state, a Georgetown Republican wants to make sure the greater good of S.C. GOP Chair Karen Floyd comes after her role has ended.

The resolution is in response to a private meeting Floyd held this week with Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour — a potential 2012 presidential candidate — and top area activists and donors at her downtown business, The Palladian Group.

“We have a duty as the executive committee of the South Carolina Republican Party to ensure the integrity of the presidential primary,” said Jill Kelso, who sits on the committee and plans to introduce the resolution. “And I just don't want to jeopardize that integrity. I don't want a cloud over the primary process in any way, shape or form.”

In that case, pay back Howard Rich his money he donated to you in 2008, Jill. I just love Republican infighting. The root is one doesn't want the other to have more money, more power. 

Georgetown GOP Chair silent on jobs returning to Georgetown

In a continuation of what I shared last night, the Georgetown Republican Party Chair Tom Swatzel can be grouped along with Ryan and Scott.

There has been no public gratitude shared for jobs returning to Georgetown County. Steelworkers have been returning to work since late last year and no word from Swatzel on how exciting it is to see jobs come back to a hard-hit county by unemployment.

You'd think that since the Republicans hate people on unemployment checks, food stamps and Medicaid, they would rush at the opportunity to applaud steelworkers returning to ArcelorMittal's payrolls.

Wishful thinking.

Swatzel has been too busy involving himself with making sure any magistrate that is nominated comes from the cloth of God outright. You know, making sure moral code is enforced since Jesus personally told Swatzel to do such. Hey, that's his prerogative.

So, forget the prime opportunity to recognize real improvement - in front of their faces.

You won't see any appreciative public response from Republicans on steelworkers going back to work.

Tell Congress: Investing in Education is an Investment in Our Nation’s Future

This week, the House of Representatives passed a resolution to slash federal funding.  If applied to education, these cuts would result in a loss of over $9 billion for education programs, devastating programs like Title I, IDEA, and Pell Grants and leaving millions of students without the resources they need to succeed.  

While the Senate is not expected to act on these cuts, this House vote was the first step in a plan to reduce funding even further, with even more damaging consequences for students, schools and our nation.

Investing in education is an investment in our nation’s future.  Research shows an inextricable link between investment in education and economic strength.  Investing in education:

• Increases productivity and ensures a competitive workforce
• Leads to higher earnings for educated workers, thereby generating higher tax payments at the local, state, and federal levels
• Reduces dependence on public assistance programs
• Raises wages across the board, as all workers, regardless of education level, earn more when there are more college graduates in the labor force. 

Students get only one shot at an education.  It is not their fault they are in school during a devastating economic crisis.

Take Action TODAY:  Tell Congress to invest in education for our nation’s future.

Scott, Ryan have yet to offer public support for steel mill reopening

Republicans talk so much about jobs. Producing them, however, is a different story.

U.S. First District Rep. Tim Scott and House Seat 108 Rep. Kevin Ryan have yet to come out publicly in support of the reopening of ArcelorMittal - a steel mill that has been dormant for a year and a half.

Sources say both are in support of dredging the port in Georgetown, but that has been signaled behind closed doors. In public, they have yet to produce on such words. Here's Ryan's announced support, but no follow through yet.

Republicans spoke about jobs during the midterm election. Why are they afraid to support them in public?

The steelworkers in Georgetown most likely supported Scott and Ryan. So why no public support in return?

It's embarrassing to see elected officials not stand proud on the fact jobs have returned to a hard-hit county - one they represent. But hey, Scott doesn't even have an office in Georgetown.

Here's a challenge - How about the both of you hold a joint press conference at the USW Local 7898 union hall, proudly speaking on the return of honest, high-paying jobs that spawn secondary jobs to others in the county.

Betcha they won't touch it.

Voter ID laws carry hefty price tag for cash-strapped states

By Chris Kromm - Facing South

In 2010, Republicans campaigned on the issues of jobs, taxes and the economy -- and with  states still reeling from scarce jobs and tight budgets, GOP leaders have pledged to keep that focus.

In North Carolina, incoming House Speaker Rep. Thom Tillis (R) opened the 2011 session this week by putting wrist-bands on the desks of every house member that said "Think Jobs" -- the same ones he gave to GOP candidates last fall, with instructions to snap them if they ever wandered off-message.

But as state legislatures have opened for business over the last week, GOP lawmakers have begun not by pushing bills focused on jobs, but for measures that would require citizens to show photo identification while voting -- laws which, among other controversial features, will end up costing states tens of millions of dollars to implement.

GOP leaders have introduced voter ID bills or plan to in Colorado, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Wisconsin. In Texas -- which faces a budget shortfall of over $10 billion -- Gov. Rick Perry (R) went so far as to declare voter ID a legislative "emergency" to fast-track the bill.

All the bills have sparked controversy. For one, there's scant evidence that voter impersonation at the polls -- the one kind of fraud that ID laws address -- is a big problem. The bills are also viewed by Democrats and voting rights advocates as deeply partisan, given studies that show the elderly, African-Americans, Hispanics/Latinos and other constituencies are most likely to not have the needed ID cards.

But at a time when states face staggering budget shortfalls, the biggest problem facing voter ID bills may be that states simply can't afford them.

An effective, full-scale voter ID program can easily end up costing state taxpayers $20 million or more -- the three-year price tag officials estimated in 2010 for a program in Missouri. For most states, such a costly program would be a suspect luxury in ordinary times; it's nearly impossible to justify in in today's economic crisis.

Among the costs that cash-strapped states face from voter ID laws:

* VOTER EDUCATION: State officials agree that voter ID laws require major publicity and education efforts to avoid voter confusion and make sure legitimate voters aren't turned away at the polls. In 2010, Missouri estimated it would cost $16.9 million [pdf] for TV, radio and newspaper announcements and other outreach to the state's 4 million voters.

* WHO PAYS FOR I.D.? Studies show that up to 11% of citizens don't have a photo ID. Forcing voters to buy cards has made states the target of lawsuits claiming such costs amount to a modern-day poll tax. To solve the problem, many states now issue free ID cards, but it's expensive: In 2009, Wisconsin (3.5 million voters) projected a total $2.4 million cost [pdf]; Missouri estimated $3.4 million [pdf].

* IMPLEMENTING VOTER ID: Voter ID laws generate dozens of new costs for state and local officials: accommodating longer lines at DMV offices, updating forms and websites, hiring and training staff to handle provisional ballots for those who don't have ID on Election Day. In 2009, Maryland estimated it would cost one county over $95,000 a year [pdf] just to hire and train precinct judges to examine IDs of voters. With local governments already cutting programs and staff to the bone, states will likely need to appropriate millions of dollars each year to help cover these new expenses.

While high, these figures may not even fully capture the full costs of a voter ID program. For years, state leaders have been hiding or low-balling the budget impacts of voter ID measures, presumably to help get them passed amidst bitter partisan controversy.

A Facing South analysis of the fiscal notes, or cost estimates lawmakers are required to submit with proposed bills, in five states* finds that lawmakers routinely failed to budget for essential elements of carrying out a voter ID law, including informing voters, administrative costs, hiring and training staff and other necessary expenses.

In other cases, state budget estimates have noted the expenses, but blithely said they would be "absorbed" by existing state and local agencies. When Georgia signed its amended ID bill into law in 2006, lawmakers infamously didn't even include a fiscal note [pdf] with the bill, even though the state admitted counties would need at least $1 million for equipment alone. In 2009, Texas officials similarly tried to side-step the costs, making the astonishing claim that their program would have "no significant fiscal implication to the State."

Such budgetary sleights-of-hand may have worked in the past, but they're unlikely to be accepted by officials today as they are asked to slash budgets and lay off core staff at every level of government.

In short, the more honest state officials are about what's needed to implement a voter ID program -- and the less they try to push those costs off onto already-struggling agencies -- the higher the price tag.

Given the much bigger problems facing states today, is the GOP's voter ID crusade really something they can afford?

* Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Texas and Wisconsin

S.C. Dems Chair says state GOP 'not smart enough to solve real problems'

South Carolina Democratic Party Chairwoman Carol Fowler said today the S.C. Republicans "just aren't smart enough to solve the real problems of this state!"

Fowler made the comment in sharing a story on Facebook regarding the S.C. GOP and the Voter ID bill. 

Perhaps nowhere else in the country does the idea of forcing a voter to flash a photo ID at the polls find such a comfortable foothold among Republicans than in the conservative South. Consider it part of an uninterrupted history when it comes to voting rights in the region. Long ago, it used to be that only white landowners could vote, and later only those who could read or pay a poll tax. But lately, judging by the actions of many Palmetto State lawmakers, it seems as though the lessons from all of that haunted history have been removed by some kind of political lobotomy.

I agree with Fowler. The Republicans in this state who make laws just aren't smart enough to solve problems facing the people of the state. So, they decide to work on legislation to prevent - or try to prevent - voters the ease of voting. We already have procedures and standards to monitor voting. The GOP just got scared in 2008 because of a huge turnout on the Democratic side.

You see, the Republicans have gamed the system so much that if there is a problem, it has to be a human cheating. It could never be the machine or other mishap relating to technical difficulties.

Instead of working to save public education - and fight back against people like Howard Rich buying for-profit education policy - Republicans think it's more important for people to play poker in-home.

POKER!?!?

That's a showstopper to lawmakers in this state. Not the unemployed. Not the children. Not the teachers. Not the sick. Not the uninsured. Not the majority of people who need help.

Carol, you're right on. They aren't smart enough. Not compassionate enough. Not able enough.

But South Carolinians STILL vote for them. And, unfortunately, their demise.

South Carolina Democratic Party Chair Carol Fowler's Statement on the State of the Union Address

Columbia – This evening, President Obama delivered his State of the Union Address.  Following the President's address South Carolina Democratic Party Chair Carol Fowler released the following statement:


"Over the past two years, President Obama has accomplished an incredible amount to get our country back on track.  He pulled our economy back from the brink of depression and restored economic growth, and is continuing to support job creation here in South Carolina and across the country.  He enacted historic health reforms, guaranteeing that South Carolina families and businesses can secure quality health coverage at a more affordable price.  He strengthened America's national security by bringing our country's combat operations in Iraq to an end and focusing on combating terrorists wherever they live.  He supported greater equality for American service members with the repeal of 'Don’t Ask, Don't Tell,' and for women with the enactment of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.  And he is supporting new opportunities for South Carolina children through student lending reform and educational innovation.
 
"Tonight, President Obama made it clear that he will continue to build upon these accomplishments over the next year, enabling more families to achieve the American Dream and cementing a new foundation for American prosperity. He laid out his priorities for the future—to build our economy, create jobs and opportunity, and out-educate, out-innovate, and out-build our competitors.  He outlined the way we must deal with the debt and deficit and reform our government for the 21st century.   I think I can say without a doubt that all of us this evening were delighted to hear the President's aims for the next year, and we are excited to join him in realizing his vision for a more perfect union.  As we heard from President Obama tonight, America will win the future."

Katie Couric puts the boots to racist Glenn Beck on his refusal to define 'white culture'

South Carolina receives emergency contingency funds for energy assistance

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced today the release of $200 million in emergency contingency funding to help eligible low-income homeowners and renters meet home energy costs. These Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) contingency funds will provide states, territories, tribes and the District of Columbia with additional assistance to pay heating and other home energy costs.

South Carolina receives $1,740,106 in contingency funding, with a total of $25,142,318 in allocated funds.

“During the cold winter months, heating your home becomes more than a matter of comfort,” said Sebelius. “The release of these emergency funds will help low-income families and individuals afford the high energy costs rather than force them to make cutbacks on other essentials.”

LIHEAP helps eligible families pay for home heating, cooling and other energy costs, as well as helping to weatherize eligible families’ homes.

The $200 million in emergency contingency funds released today are in addition to the basic LIHEAP funding made available to states under the continuing resolutions since October 1 totaling $3.9 billion for Fiscal Year 2011.

“Low-income individuals and families are hit hard by energy costs,” said David A. Hansell, HHS acting assistant secretary for children and families. “We are releasing these emergency funds to states to help meet the critical needs of vulnerable children, seniors and families.”

For a complete listing of state allocations of funds released today go to: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/news/press/2011/fy11_liheap_funds.html.

Tim Scott votes against millions with pre-existing health conditions

Recent Congressional Votes House: Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act Upcoming Congressional Bills Senate: Filibuster rules overhaul House: Non-security spending cuts House: Presidential election fund Editor's Note: NOTE: The Senate and House will meet in a special session January 25, 2011 at 8:35 p.m. to hear President Obama's State of the Union speech.

Recent House Votes

Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act - Vote Passed (245-189, 1 Not Voting) The House voted to repeal the 2010 health care law. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has vowed to block the bill in the Senate. Rep. Tim Scott voted YES......send e-mail or see bio

Upcoming Votes

Filibuster rules overhaul - S.RES.10 The Senate is scheduled to continue debating this resolution that would overhaul its filibuster rules. Non-security spending cuts - H.RES.38 This House resolution would require the Budget committee chairman to reduce non-security related discretionary spending to 2008 levels. Presidential election fund - H.R.359 The House is scheduled to consider this bill that would end taxpayer financing of presidential campaigns and party conventions.

Hold Lindsey Graham Accountable

Hold Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) accountable for wanting to raise the Social Security retirement age.

In tragedy’s wake

The church can offer a message of hope and reconciliation to a nation that is hurting and deeply divided. We urge those who claim the name of Christ to "put away from you all bitterness and wrath and anger and wrangling and slander, together with all malice, and be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ has forgiven you" (Ephesians 4:31-32).

We pledge to God and to each other that we will lead by example in a country where civil discourse and peacemaking are rare. We will work to model a better way in how we treat each other in our many communities, across religious and political lines. We will strive to create safe and sacred spaces for common prayer and community discussion as we come together to seek God's will for our nation and our world.

1.) We believe Jesus' teaching that "Blessed are those who make peace" (Matthew 5:9). We acknowledge that most of us have been guilty of violence in our hearts and with our tongues. We hold ourselves to the higher standard to which Christ called us: to refrain from not only physical violence but violence of the heart and tongue. "Do not commit murder. Anyone who murders will be judged for it," and "Do not be angry with your brother or sister" (Mathew 5:22-23).

2.) We commit that our dialogue with each other will reflect the spirit of the Scriptures, which tell us, in relating to each other, to be "quick to listen, slow to speak, and slow to become angry" (James 1:19).

3.) We believe that each of us, and our fellow human beings, are created in the image of God. This belief should be reflected in the honor and respect we show to each other, particularly in how we speak. "With the tongue we bless the Lord and Father, and with it we curse those who are made in the likeness of God ... this ought not to be so" (James 3:9,10).

4.) We pledge that when we disagree, we will do so respectfully, without falsely impugning the other's motives, attacking the other's character, or questioning the other's faith. We will be mindful of our language, being neither arrogant nor boastful in our beliefs as we strive to "be completely humble and gentle; be patient, bearing with one another in love" (Ephesians 4:2).

5.) We recognize that we cannot function together as citizens of the same community, whether local or national, unless we are mindful of how we treat each other. Each of us must therefore "put off falsehood and speak truthfully to his neighbor, for we are all members of one body" (Ephesians 4:25).

6.) We commit to pray for our political leaders — those with whom we agree or disagree. "I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made — for kings and all who are in high positions" (1 Timothy 2:1-2).

7.) We believe that it is more difficult to hate others, even adversaries and enemies, when we are praying for them. We commit to pray for each other, those with whom we agree and those with whom we may disagree, so that we may be faithful witnesses to our Lord, who prayed "that they may be one" (John 17:22).

Jamie Sanderson
Georgetown

Pouting Front Street businesses get their way

Well, it seems after 23 years of being in June, the annual Harborwalk Festival will be held in May.

And you can thank pouting Front Street businesses for the move. Or maybe not. I believe thanks could be given to city council members who caved.

While some argued for a cooler month to hold the event, the underlying reason could not be held back.

Even though the festival is a one-day-a-year event that lasts eight hours, it  has consumed a large amount of the attention of Council for the past two months.

On Thursday night, the original request that was made was to continue the end of June tradition. After a discussion that lasted more than 30 minutes, Wayne agreed to amend her request.

Mayor Jack Scoville said he could not support a June 25 festival for various reasons. One, he said, is because it is a busy weekend for tourism since it is the week before Independence Day and should be a booming business day for Downtown merchants. The festival, he said, kills business.

Wrong. The festival does not "kill business" as the mayor professes. You see, I actually saw Scoville walking up and down the street during the event last year and talked to him about it. I saw where he was asking these businesses about their "deaths" that day. He also made note of those who stayed closed. Quite a few.

Wayne disagreed, saying the festival draws thousands of people to Front Street and if merchants are not able to persuade them to come inside their stores, “that’s their problem.”

And it is their problem. The reason these people are in business is to offer unique items to people, to attract costumers and retain their business. I hate to say it, but bars, antique shops and furniture stores are not going to do great on a Saturday - no matter what goes on and what month it is. Well, maybe the bars will. But hey, who do they benefit?

Knowing the matter was on the agenda for a second straight month, an email was sent to Front Street business owners from a business person Thursday asking them to attend the meeting. However, no one spoke during the public comment period.

Gee, I wonder why? If so mad and "killed" by a festival, why not defend your business and show you're hurt by the event? 

The businesses get what they want in the end. No matter. It will not make any difference to them. They won't see a massive uptick in business. As if people wake up in Ohio or New York saying to themselves they desperately need to get to the antique shop on Front Street in G-Town.

As a side note, Wayne said she has been contacted by officials from the Town of Andrews who said if Georgetown does not want the festival they would love to have it in their town.

At least some people see the benefit of it. 

S.C. Education Opportunity Act is anything but opportunity for children, parents

Here we are dealing with massive cuts to public education in the state of South Carolina and we have bought-and-paid for Republicans pushing more "school choice" down our throat. Howard Rich and friends must be really happy.

Why? Because they (along with Republicans in this state) don't want public education nor do they like the fact they can bully the curriculum to teach what they want to teach.

The South Carolina Education Opportunity Act, or S. 520, is anything but opportunity.Sponsored by South Carolinians for Responsible Government lackees, the bill is designed to give school choice lobbyists what they want: profit margins.

New York tycoon Howard Rich and pals have stacked the deck - and it looks as if this year, or Haley's term, may be the shining light they were looking for in order to get it out of committee, passed and signed into law. 

Right-wing lingo:

State Income Tax Credits: Any person in South Carolina who files a state tax return and pays part of a student’s tuition will be able to claim a credit. The credit for tuition of a child with special needs will average $4,867 (or 100% of the state’s average student spending). The credit for children zoned to attend failing public schools will be 75% of that amount (or $3,650). All other students will be eligible for a credit of 50% of state spending (averaging $2,433) but no one can take a credit greater than the actual spending on tuition. Parents who homeschool their children can claim up to $1,000 per child in credits based on their instruction related expenses.

Truth:

It's a credit. Meaning you'll pay up front - in full - and get credited. Going by their lingo, you'll still have cost to cover no matter what. The child with special needs will be the only child who sees full tuition coverage, according to their math.

But what about low-income?

They'll be relying on non-profits to take care of them. You know, basically what Gov. Haley rambled about in referring to faith-based organizations fitting bills for what government is for. As if they don't have anything to do already.

Yes, your child's education will depend on charities - rather than government. Isn't this the same concept, different provider? Oh, that's right... Government is meant to pay and provide for elected officials, not the general public. Specifically? Republicans. 

Look, we already have public school choice in the state of South Carolina. Why not fix the tax code, replenish monies to public education, save the schools we already have and build more positive relationships with existing structures and people.

Dealing in reality

I deal in reality. Let be known that this day forward I will not answer any questions posed to me unless you can ask them personally. If people really want discussion and answer sessions (and consume my time), have the respect and decency to stand behind what you say or ask. Both online and in person.

I have very interesting conversations at work about politics and everyday issues. Not a one of them wear a bag on their head.

The president doesn't wear a bag on his head. Jim DeMint spews nonstop regressive rhetoric and can do it with a face and name. 

I see people all the time in public. I make it a point to stand in certain places for many minutes while people pass me by in places like Food Lion or Walmart. 

I am pretty much done giving clout to nameless people who are too afraid to stand from behind a curtain and speak out - or just speak to me.

Abortion Rights in Jeopardy as Roe v. Wade Reaches 38th Anniversary

Statement of NOW President Terry O'Neill

January 21, 2011

Tomorrow is the 38th anniversary of the Supreme Court's landmark Roe v. Wade decision recognizing a woman's constitutional right to legal abortion care. As we honor this milestone, we thank those whose courage and determination made Roe possible, and we pause to remember the many women who died from illegal abortions and all those who have been killed or injured in the course of providing the full range of reproductive health care to women.

This anniversary takes place at a critical time for the women of this country. Since last November's election, the radical right has paraded itself in new clothes. After a campaign season with promises to put the economy first, the new speaker of the House, John Boehner (R-Ohio), just yesterday clarified that further abortion funding restrictions are of "highest" priority for Republicans, and a jobs package will come later.

With that statement, Republicans in the House introduced the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act (H.R. 3). This dangerous bill goes far beyond making permanent the deeply unjust Hyde Amendment, which currently bars federal funding for abortion care. It would drastically reduce access to medically necessary emergency abortions at state and local public hospitals; impose tax penalties on individuals and businesses using private health care plans; and further whittle exemptions for rape, incest and health.

The late Henry Hyde, author of the infamous Hyde Amendment, admitted that he wanted to prevent all women from obtaining abortions, but the only ones he had real power over were poor women, so that's who he went after. Can you believe John Boehner has called this man a hero?

Legislators from the radical right are eager to make this moment a turning point in their crusade to outlaw abortion care. We cannot let them. We cannot let them because abortion is a constitutional right. And we cannot let them because they won't stop there. I promise that if we let them overturn Roe, they will come for contraception next.

But we outnumber them, and if this anniversary tells us anything, it's that women can, must and will retain control over their bodies and their lives. Abortion is neither tragic nor trivial. Each woman's story is different, and politicians do not have a right to make unilateral decisions for all women on the basis of their own religious beliefs.

Safe, legal and accessible abortion is a necessary condition for achieving women's full equality. That is why we work together and why we refuse to give up.

Georgetown Times introduces citizen fourm

The Georgetown Times has decided to establish a forum for its readers and is similar to Marty Tennant's Citizen's Report.

Publisher John Carr had this to say about the endeavor:

We recently launched a forum section of our website.  It is just getting started.  It is my hope it will be a place where a wide range of local topics will be discussed by interested citizens.  Might take a bit to get going.  Just wanted to let you all know in hopes you will check back from times to time.  Hopefully you will participate as well.

'Stupak on Steroids' introduced in the House

The new anti-choice leadership in the U.S. House of Representatives has made its third bill an unprecedented attack on choice. Don't let it go unanswered: contact your representative.

This is what an anti-choice U.S. House of Representatives looks like.

Last night, 245 representatives voted to overturn the new health-care law and take away millions of women's access to prenatal care and birth-control coverage.

And today, Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) introduced "Stupak on Steroids," a bill that would impose tax penalties on millions of American families, jeopardizing women's ability to buy private insurance with abortion coverage.

Remind the new Congress that we didn't elect them to play politics with our freedom and privacy.

Tell Rep. Tim Scott: "Vote NO on "Stupak on Steroids" and protect the right to choose."

"Stupak on Steroids" is a very serious threat to women's access to abortion. It would force you and your family to pay more taxes if your health plan covers abortion, jeopardize abortion coverage in the private market, and make it even more difficult for rape and incest survivors who rely on the government for their health care to access abortion services.

And "Stupak on Steroids" could very well pass. There are 246 anti-choice members in the House, which is more than enough to win.

We must speak out against this dangerous bill. Please join me in calling on the House to vote "no" on "Stupak on Steroids."

Our opponents have made this bill a top priority, and so have we. Right now, we are educating reporters to cut through the misinformation that our anti-choice opponents are trying to spread and meeting with our allies in Congress to keep this bill from reaching the president's desk.


Because we face the most challenging landscape in the House in decades, we must reach each and every lawmaker, no matter where he or she stands on choice.

• Members with mixed voting records on choice need to hear from far more pro-choice constituents than anti-choice ones. Tell them that voters in their district don't want divisive policies on abortion.
• Pro-choice representatives need your backing to champion our cause and rally their allies.
• Anti-choice members need to know that their pro-choice constituents are watching and are ready to vote for pro-choice challengers in the next election.

We must reach every member of the House, and your voice has real power. Contact your representative TODAY.

"Stupak on Steroids" is the most far-reaching anti-choice measure we have seen in a long time, and it's part of a larger state and federal strategy. If we let this intrusion go unanswered, we'll hand our anti-choice opponents a major victory in their mission to take away a woman's right to choose.

Thank you for taking action now.

My best,

Nancy Keenan
President, NARAL Pro-Choice America

Rep. Tim Scott keeps his insurance while voting to repeal health care bill

Tell Rep. Scott: Your turn. Click here to see the form we'll fax to your representative. Rep. Tim Scott voted to repeal affordable health care for 32 million Americans, but hasn't opted out of his own generous federal health benefits.  Call out this health care hypocrisy now. Who would have the audacity to vote for repealing affordable health care for 32 million Americans while gladly accepting generous, federally subsidized insurance for themselves? Your representative — Rep. Scott — along with 236 other congressional health care hypocrites. Over the past two years, especially during the election season, Republicans and a select few Democrats did everything they could to derail health care reform. They fueled fears and misinformation, throwing around terms like "socialist," "fascist," "government takeover," and of course "death panels." Now they've fulfilled their campaign promise and voted for a full repeal. But what most of them haven't done is given up the affordable, subsidized care that they voted yesterday to deny so many of us.1 Call out the health care hypocrisy. Click here and we will send a fax to Rep. Scott on your behalf, with the actual form he can submit to cancel his federal health insurance. The hypocrisy of the health care repeal effort has known no bounds. And yesterday the health care hypocrites went all the way, voting to repeal the entire health care bill — without offering alternatives, without dialing back their anti-government rhetoric or changing the bill's outrageous official title ("Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act"), and without repealing the generous federal insurance benefits they receive and have worked so hard to deny to others. As progressives, we value a system that helps Americans get the care they need. And new polling indicates that the majority of Americans want to keep or strengthen reforms that help provide affordable care.2 If Rep. Scott doesn't believe the federal government should play a role in that — fine. But rather than voting to deny affordable care to millions of Americans and allowing insurance companies to discriminate against children on the basis of pre-existing conditions, he should practice what he preaches and start by canceling his own federal care — care that you and I pay for. Repeal proponents have long argued the wisdom and availability of private insurance. So these representatives should have no trouble getting great private health coverage from the insurance companies they've been representing so well. Tell Rep. Scott to practice what he preaches. Send him the form to cancel his federal health insurance. Thanks for taking a stand against health care hypocrisy, Elijah Zarlin, Campaign Manager  CREDO Action 1"Do As I Say, Not As I Do: 97% Of House GOP Still Holding On To Their Congressional Health Plans" Think Progress, January 18, 2011 2"Repealing Progress" The Progress Report, January 18th, 2011

SC Democratic Party Chair Carol Fowler Expresses Disappointment at Republican Vote to Repeal the Affordable Care Act

Columbia, SC – Today, Republicans in the House of Representatives voted to repeal the Affordable Care Act.  Following that vote, SC Democratic Party Chair Carol Fowler released the following statement:

“Today, House Republicans took a vote that can be viewed at best as a partisan gesture to the extreme right wing of their party and at worst an affront to millions of middle class Americans.  The repeal of the Affordable Care Act, as approved by House Republicans, would have two primary consequences: Americans would be stripped of patient protections and health insurance would become more unaffordable for families and for America as a whole.

“The Republican-approved repeal legislation enables insurance companies to take away individuals’ insurance coverage when they get sick or deny it to them in the first place; it takes Americans’ health care decisions out of the hands of their doctors and puts them into the hands of insurance companies; it enables insurance companies to raise premiums suddenly and without justification; and it increases America’s deficit by $1 trillion over the next twenty years.

“Unfortunately, South Carolina Republicans were among those trying to get rid of those critical benefits – taking away Americans’ health care freedoms.  They have reneged on their promise to stand up for South Carolinians and their actions would saddle South Carolina’s children with unnecessary and burdensome national debt.  I am extremely disappointed by this vote to take these protections from  South Carolina’s families, and I applaud Congressional Democrats for doing what is necessary to protect the Affordable Care Act, protect America’s fiscal future, and protect Americans’ health care freedoms.”

Let's contact Kevin Ryan for two years straight

Well, he's our representative.

Republican state Rep. Kevin Ryan has been elected to serve District 108 for two years. Now is the time to contact him repeatedly on any and every issue dear to your heart. You can call him at 843.385.1242. An e-mail address that is known to work is kevin@ryanforhouse.com.

District 108 - Charleston & Georgetown Counties
(H) PO Box 1097, Pawleys Island, 29585-1097
      Bus. (843) 385-1242      Home (843) 385-1242
(C) 320A Blatt Bldg., Columbia, 29201
      Bus. (803) 212-6927

Reach out.

Howard Rich group helps to secure District 108 for Kevin Ryan

I have to admit. Republican state Rep. Kevin Ryan didn't need Howard Rich money to beat Democratic Vida Miller.

But the local GOP did.

The largest donor to the county party was South Carolinians for Responsible Government, a group that campaigns for school choice. It gave the party $10,000. Its chairman is Tom Swatzel, who also chairs the county GOP.

That's right. SCRG bypassed Ryan and gave directly to the Georgetown GOP to fund the mailers that attacked Miller. Some way, somehow Tom Swatzel found a way to be snake. He got what he wanted, too.

In a sour way, of course.

PROTECT is getting ready for 2011

The new year is always busy for PROTECT, because it’s when all the lawmakers go back to work. But this January is busier than ever, as PROTECT staff gets ready for some major changes that will make us more effective in 2011. Expect more on that soon ...

Here’s the latest news:

A 50-State Strategy
PROTECT was out in California this month, exploring the best way to turn our 2009-2010 successes in Virginia into a model that can be used in California and all states. Our focus: child exploitation and holding the child protection system accountable.

National Sheriff’s Association Endorses Alicia’s Law
While on the west coast, PROTECT met with the National Sheriff’s Association (NSA). We’re proud to announce that the NSA has endorsed our Alicia’s Law campaign. We’ll have more on that soon.

Making Sure it’s Right on Crime
An influential national campaign was announced last month, headed up by a group of well-known conservatives, including Newt Gingrich. “Right on Crime” wants to cut taxpayer spending on prisons. Some see it as a sign that conservatives and liberals can work together at last. But we have our concerns, and you can read them in Grier Weeks's recent column in the Daily Caller.

Child Rescue: A “Brain Hurricane” at Oak Ridge
Finally, here’s an update that should make your day from JonAnn Gledhill, the Director of the Child Rescue Project at our sister organization, Promise to Protect:

We had a very exciting end to 2010, when Promise was able to assemble U.S. law enforcement agents and Oak Ridge National Lab (ORNL) computer scientists here in Knoxville, TN to discuss new ventures. Several new and advanced technologies are being developed through this partnership, including software to combat the sexual exploitation of children online, new online networks, and investigative and data analytics software. All this will help lead law enforcement to hands-on offenders and the rescue of thousands of children.

This face-to-face meeting was imperative to the development of these tools and technologies that are being created and enhanced. All those in attendance thought the meetings were a huge success. According to one agent, “The potential is mind-boggling; brainstorming would be a misnomer in describing the meeting we had at ORNL, it was more like a brain hurricane. ... The future of this combined project will have very far-reaching effects … and many a child will be spared the nightmare of child exploitation.” The agent added, “I do believe that as we grow old our thoughts will be of when we came together and started down this road for the betterment of future generations.”
 
We will keep you updated as this exciting progress continues.


--THE STAFF AND VOLUNTEERS AT PROTECT

ArcelorMittal - Georgetown is worthy 'eyesore'

There has been talk recently in the City of Georgetown about doing away with eyesores along Highway 17.

A drive down Highway 17 — the most traveled entrance into the city — shows several buildings that are in need of attention by owners. Some structures more so than others.

The city has made a list of the problems which range from simple overgrown grass and bushes and litter, all the way up to “dilapidated” buildings that need to be renovated or removed.

“They are definitely eyesores,” said Georgetown City Councilman Paige Sawyer, who has been trying to get something done about problem properties for years. “I see the problem as irresponsible property owners and not enough aggression on the city’s part. 

A few, but very loud, people consider the ArcelorMittal - Georgetown steel plant an eyesore, too. I would recommend those people taking up some history lessons or venturing to the library to research more about the site the steel plant sits on. Though if that's too hard, I have provided some rich history right here.

Georgetown Steel was founded by Willie Korf in 1969 as a rebar mill in Georgetown, South Carolina. Initially, the mill was non-union, but in 1971, the United Steelworkers of America (USWA) began an organizing drive. The mill's management resisted the union drive and a strike ensued. The mill continued to operate using management personnel and any local labour that was willing to cross the picket lines. After nine months the strike was settled when the mill recognized the union. In the late 1970s Korf built a second mini-mill, designed to produce wire, in Beaumont, Texas. The debt burden resulting from this expansion and difficulties in competing with imports resulted in the mill being forced into bankruptcy. The mill operated in bankruptcy for some time because the creditors had no desire to try to sell the assets. In 1984 two events occurred that transformed Georgetown into a successful mini-mill: the mill developed a new business strategy, and the Government of Kuwait purchased an ownership interest in the mill. The new business strategy involved moving from the rebar market into higher quality, higher value-added rod markets. The infusion of capital by the new owners enabled the mill to make the equipment changes necessary to succeed in its new market. In 1995 Bain Capital, an investment firm, purchased Georgetown Steel and a mini-mill in Kansas City, Missouri that was formerly owned by Armco, and combined the assets. The mills are expected to complement each other. The Georgetown facility is providing leadership and technological expertise (several managers from Georgetown moved to Kansas City) and the excess melting capacity at Georgetown balances the excess rolling capacity at the Kansas City plant.

The mill currently produces approximately 920,000 tonnes of steel rod per year (table 4). About 80% of the production is high carbon and specialty steel -- there has been a steady move to higher proportions of the high quality steel.³ The plant consists of a melt shop, a rolling mill, a Midrex Direct Reduced Iron (DRI) plant and shipping facilities. The melt shop is composed of two furnaces: the first was installed in 1969, converted to Eccentric Bottom Tapping (EBT) in December 1987 and has an average heat size of 78 tonne s; the second furnace was installed in 1974, converted to EBT in December of 1986, and also has an average heat size of 78 tonne s. The mill's ladle refining facilities consist of an EAF that was converted into a ladle refining furnace in November 1984, and a second ladle furnace that was installed in 1988. The mill has two casters: the original four-strand Concast caster from 1969 and a five-strand Danieli caster installed in 1989. The rolling mill is composed of a two-strand, nine- stand roughing mill, an intermediate mill with six stands and a Kocks precision sizing mill, installed in 1991, and a no-twist ten-stand finishing mill. The mill began to make rod products in 1971, with the installation of the Stelmore deck. The rolling mill also uses a compactor and a hook conveyer system for material handling.

This steel plant has a lot of history behind. It also has a lot of jobs, too. The mill reopened after an 18-month idling and is on track to produce steel for consumption by the end of January 2011.

The so-called eyesore is even recognized by the City of Georgetown - as is the wood mill that held the exact grounds before the steel plant. I wonder whether or not if people put up with such negative talk then.

The need for an economic alternative to rice was met by lumber. The Atlantic Coast Lumber Company was incorporated in 1903. By 1914, it was the largest lumber producing plant on the East Coast. However, in 1932 ACL declared bankruptcy and Georgetown entered a period of immense economic decline. Recovery began in 1936 when International Paper Company built a plant here. By 1942 this plant had become the largest kraft paper mill in the world. Georgetown Steel and an array of other smaller plants have diversified Georgetown's industrial base. Commercial fishing has become a significant industry. In recent years, retirees and vacationers have contributed greatly to the well-being of the area. Tourism has become an increasingly significant element in the area's economy.

The steel plant isn't an eyesore. It's a lifeline to hundreds of people who work there and to the secondary jobs it spawns. I would hope people to appreciate such history, coexist and work together to find greater ways to improve upon what we have - and what made us unique - instead of selling out for a get-rich-quick scheme.

Residents, my friends, could eventually be considered eyesores, too. Especially with narrow-minded attitudes that include tourism being the save-all for the city.

ArcelorMittal - Georgetown is open for business. Soon, the eyesore will become a earsore as well.

And many, many people have been waiting for the noise - in a positive way.

Faithful America urges you to protect health care!

The House is voting on WEDNESDAY to take away health care reform! We need to send Congress a strong message that people of faith remain committed to protecting reform. Sign the Petition to Protect Health Care today People of faith were instrumental in passing health care reform last year, but our struggle is far from over. Egged on by the Tea Party, the new Congress has made taking away health care reform its #1 priority -- and we need to step up to protect it. This Wednesday, the House will vote on a bill repealing health care reform. While this bill is not expected to survive the Senate or President Obama’s veto pen, it’s the first step in a very real campaign to take away health care reform, through funding cuts, legislation and lawsuits. Let Congress know this is unacceptable. Sign the Petition to Protect Health Care today. Repeal and funding cuts would take away important protections given to us by the new law, especially for young people and seniors. Worst of all, putting insurance companies back in charge means going back to the days when insurers could arbitrarily deny coverage, hike up premiums or drop patients from their insurance plans without notice. With all the pressing issues facing our nation, we don’t have time for our leaders to play political games that takes us backward, not forward. Sign the Petition to Protect Health Care. Today our nation honors Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., whose commitment to justice for all people was an inspiration to many of us during the long and often frustrating campaign for health care reform. As many of us take time to honor King's memory through service, we recommit ourselves to doing all we can to create a nation that more and more resembles his dream. Thanks for all you do, Beth, Nick, Dan, Allison, Kristin, John and Jennifer The Faithful America Team

Tim Scott continues Brown tradition: No Georgetown Office

You really can tell that Republicans are carbon copies of their predecessors.

First Congressional District Congressman Tim Scott has revealed his website, indicating no Georgetown office.

Former lawmaker Henry Brown must have told Rep. Scott to just forget Georgetown all together - as he did for years.

It's obvious in the hustle he is making in securing funds for the Georgetown port.

State Senator supports 'armed intervention' of government

I just did a post at Politicususa.com on current congressmen Jeff Duncan and Mick Mulvaney for leaving behind a dismal bill that calls for armed government intervention.

It's a shame that Georgetown's state senator supports it, too. Sen. Ray Cleary is among the group that put this into effect:

Whereas, intervention by armed South Carolinians may prove to be the sole means for this State to protect the liberties guaranteed it and all other States under the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; and   /
Amend the concurrent resolution further, as and if amended, by striking the paragraph beginning on line 33 of page 4 and inserting:
/   Whereas, due to the potential need for intervention by armed South Carolinians, the protections afforded under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution are of upmost importance to the citizens of South Carolina and the State of South Carolina; and   /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend title to conform. 

Here's the state senate version. Let this be a clear reminder. These lawmakers really do want to put gears in motion for such an action. They make the laws, they spew the rhetoric. And they are surprised that people act?