The Politics of Jamie Sanderson Headline Animator

Monday, May 30, 2011

Republicans In South Carolina Are So Afraid of Obama, Voters

Yes. They are. If not, then why spend taxpayer dollars to create a solution where's there not a problem.

The initiative can't fix what's inside their heads: fear of a mass influx of voters. Here's the truth about fraud...

Allegations of widespread fraud by malevolent voters are easy to make, but often prove to be inflated or inaccurate. Crying “wolf” when the claims are unsubstantiated distracts attention from real problems that need real solutions. Moreover, these claims are frequently used to justify policies – including restrictive photo identification rules – that could not solve the alleged wrongs, but that could well disenfranchise legitimate voters.

An analysis of more than 250 claims of fraud in the Supreme Court's photo ID case       
  • Finding not one proven case of a fraudulent vote that the challenged law could prevent
  • Exposing false assertions that photo ID is required for common activities


Want more?

Photo ID

Much of the hue and cry about voter fraud is accompanied by calls for restrictive ID requirements, like laws requiring voters to show particular photo ID documents at the polls. Some of this may be a sincere, if mistaken, belief in the need for restrictive ID measures. But this clip from a May 17, 2007, Houston Chronicle article suggests another rationale:

Among Republicans it is an 'article of religious faith that voter fraud is causing us to lose elections,' [Royal] Masset[, former political director of the Republican Party of Texas,] said. He doesn't agree with that, but does believe that requiring photo IDs could cause enough of a dropoff in legitimate Democratic voting to add 3 percent to the Republican vote.

We have analyzed more than 250 claims of fraud submitted by those supporting the respondents in the Supreme Court's photo ID case, Crawford v. Marion County Election Board. We find absolutely no proven cases of fraudulent votes that could be prevented by the restrictive ID law being challenged.

Other case studies collected here by issue and by state also analyze the limited degree to which restrictive ID requirements could possibly remedy the fraud alleged in each instance.
We also collect commentary discussing the purported link between voter fraud and calls for restrictive ID requirements.


Visit here for a vast amount of informational truth.

1 comments:

DONALD said...

The initiative to suppress Democratic voters will backfire. As we move closer to the elections the Democrats will feel angry and come out en masse. It is not the demographics of the vote, but the size. Democrats sat home in 2010. Now they have a reason to vote. With only 50% of the voters normally coming out...the GOP again goofed. As in Wisconsin and Medicare they energized the Democratic base.

Post a Comment

Support I-73