
Thanks, Larry!

Governor Sanford is currently going through a divorce after admitting to an affair. Earlier this week, Sanford praised his state’s Attorney General for attempting to resurrect the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository. In a statement on Yucca, Sanford said, “We’d thank the Attorney General for helping us bring this back-room Washington D.C. deal into the light and taking legal action to make sure the 23-year bipartisan Yucca Mountain compact is honored by President Obama and Congress.”
Humbert also caught up with Karrasch, and after repeated denials that she attended the conference in Washington, she said, “It doesn’t matter who I spent time with this weekend. I spent time with Arnold Schwarzenegger this weekend. Does that matter to you?”
One of the biggest political barriers in the way of a major jobs creation effort is concern over the federal deficit. This concern is misplaced: The fact is that we can't reduce the deficit without first creating jobs for the millions of Americans who are out of work.
EPI has come together with the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, which focuses largely on long-term fiscal issues, to stress that the U.S. must Address jobs now and deficits later.
EPI President Lawrence Mishel and Peterson Foundation CEO David Walker co-authored an op-ed, which was published February 24 in Politico. "With more than a fifth of the work force expected to be unemployed or underemployed in 2010," the authors stress, "there is an economic and a moral imperative to take action."
While Mishel and Walker may not share the same perspective on many policy issues or the proper role of government, they agree that the severity of the current jobs crisis means that "Today's high deficits will have to go even higher to help address unemployment."
So many jobs have been lost that the country entered 2010 with fewer jobs than it had a decade earlier. A survey conducted for EPI late last year found that one in four American families had suffered a job loss. Within the private sector, one out of every 20 jobs has been lost since the recession started in late 2007.
We now need more than 10 million jobs to get the country back to pre-recession levels of employment. The situation would be far worse were it not for the Recovery Act, but still it's clear that much more needs to be done. Earlier this week, Mishel testified before the House Committee on Financial Services where he warned that unless Congress acts quickly and at a sufficient scale, "high and damaging unemployment will continue for years." EPI maintains that the Senate's $15 billion jobs bill is too small and of questionable efficacy. EPI's American Jobs Plan proposes spending $400 billion to create 4.6 million jobs in one year.
In their Politico piece, Mishel and Walker also agree on the need to develop a plan for addressing structural deficits, which are projected to persist even once the economy has recovered. But they argue that spending on job creation must come first.
Mishel and Walker said they co-authored the piece in an effort to change the thinking about job creation and deficit reduction, which too often are misrepresented as opposing goals.
Their op-ed is available on Politico and on EPI.org.


Jay Parmley
Executive Director
South Carolina Democratic Party
Friends,
As I travel this district and meet with supporters like you, it is clear that the issues concerning you the most are those that are discussed around our kitchen tables—the issues affecting our families and our day-to-day lives. That’s the way it is with my family. We come together at the kitchen table to discuss the issues facing us each day, and we work to figure out the solutions to our problems.
As we continue on the campaign trail, I will share my thoughts on those issues that are of most importance to our families. Please take a look at my first “Kitchen Table Talk” by clicking on the link below or visiting my website, and stay tuned in the coming months while together, we work to tackle the tough issues we face each day around our tables.
Jane Dyer
Kitchen Table: Introduction from Jane Dyer on Vimeo.


The meeting will begin at 6 p.m.
Anderson is expected to talk about the 2010 census, help with reducing utility bills, appliance rebates, help with medicare, the nature conservancy and State Superintendent of Education Jim Rex.
Free light bulbs, trash bags and fans will be handed out.
Entertainment will be provided by the Carvers Bay High School Step Team and The Mind Boys. Dinner will be served.
There is also a free drawing for gas cards, a CD player and a television.

"These are tough budget times, but we need to make necessary cuts to the budget without sacrificing things that are critical investments for our future -- and education is one of those things," said Senator Sheheen. "We owe it to our children to keep teachers in the classroom."
This week the state senate is moving forward on a bill, S. 1096, that I cosponsored with several other senators to create jobs and cut energy usage in our state. This groundbreaking law would allow our local electric cooperatives to partner with customers to rehabilitate energy-inefficient homes. The electric cooperatives would help customers finance home improvements such as weatherization, insulation, and upgrades to heating and cooling units. A Political Forum/Reception Commemorating Black History Month
“Bridging the Past … Moving into the Future”
Whittemore Park Middle School
Conway, South Carolina 29526
Friday, February 26, 2010
6:30 p.m.
This event is free and opened to the public
For more information and/or to make a monetary contribution
please contact GeFranya at (843) 450 – 8058
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius today invited insurance company chief executive officers to a March 3 meeting at HHS to discuss their companies’ insurance premiums. The CEOs of UnitedHealth Group Inc., WellPoint Inc., Aetna Inc., Health Care Service Corporation and CIGNA HealthCare Inc. along with leaders from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners have been invited.
Text of the letter delivered to insurance company CEOs is below:
Dear ______,
Across the country, health insurance premium increases are impacting American families and business owners, and experts indicate that premiums will continue to rise. In recent weeks, we have learned of premium increases of nearly 40 percent in one state and we know significant premium increases are not isolated incidents. I am concerned about these increases, which make it harder for people to access the health care they need, and eager to hear the justification for these increases and steps we can take to create a more stable system that keeps premium costs down for all Americans.
To that end, I will be hosting a meeting with insurance company executives and hope you will accept this invitation to join us on Wednesday, March 3 at the Department of Health and Human Services in Washington, D.C at 11:30 AM. Our conversation will benefit from your experience and expertise.
I hope this meeting will provide an opportunity to discuss how health insurance reform can bring down health care costs and fix our broken health insurance system. President Obama has offered a health insurance reform proposal that begins to give middle class families and small business owners the health care security they have been losing over the past 16 years. This plan was informed by our discussions with a wide variety of stakeholders over the past year including representatives from NAIC. Now, as we move forward, we welcome your thoughts and ideas about how reform can ensure all Americans have the stable, secure, affordable health care coverage they need and deserve.
We all share a commitment to fighting fraud in our health care system, driving down health care costs and implementing reforms that will add value to our health care system. I look forward to a productive conversation on these and other issues. Should you have any questions regarding this meeting, please contact my office at (202) 690-7000.
Sincerely,
Kathleen Sebelius
Secretary of Health and Human Services

The House just passed its version of the The Health Insurance Antitrust Enforcement Act.
It's time for the Senate to act, too.
E-mail Your Senators Today!
Last fall I wrote you about the sweetheart deal insurance companies have had since they were exempted from federal antitrust laws in 1945. Shielded from this scrutiny, the exemption has helped the insurance industry to put profits before people, cherry-pick customers, and deny coverage to patients when they fall ill.
They've had a great setup. Last year alone, the top five U.S. health care insurance companies made $12 billion in profits while dropping 2.7 million Americans from their insurance rolls.
More than 43,000 LeahyforVermont.com community activists responded to my message by urging their representatives to eliminate the antitrust exemption and force insurance companies to play by the same, good-competition rules as virtually every other business in America.
Our voices broke through the health insurance lobbyists who seem to be everywhere you look around Washington these days, and TODAY the House of Representatives voted 406-19 to pass its version of the Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act.
Now it's up to the Senate to take up this bill and send it to President Obama's desk to be signed into law.
Please click here to urge your Senators to pass the House version of the Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act -- so President Obama can sign it into law.The health insurance industry should compete on a level playing field just like every other business in America, large and small, so that consumers know that the price they're being quoted is the product of a free and fair marketplace.
Like most Americans I'm frustrated with the slow pace of progress towards comprehensive health care reform, though I remain hopeful we'll get the sweeping reform we need soon.
But it is unclear whether or not the final health care reform bill Congress sends to the President's desk will include a provision to end the health insurance industry antitrust exemption. Even if it does, it could be severely weakened during the final round of negotiations in Congress.
That's why we must act now to pass the Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act as a standalone bill.
Please click here to urge your Senators to pass the House version of the Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act -- so President Obama can sign it into law.
Ending the health insurance industry antitrust exemption will promote competition and consumer choice, though it is not the only reform we need. But it's a critical component of reform, and one I believe is best achieved by passing the House version of the Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act into law as soon as possible.
Thank you for taking action.
Sincerely,
Patrick Leahy
U.S. Senator
P.S. After you e-mail your Senators, please forward this message to your friends & family -- and urge them to speak out in favor of the Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act too.

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4626) to restore the application of the Federal antitrust laws to the business of health insurance to protect competition and consumers.
The House has approved a bill co-authored by U.S. Rep. Tom Perriello, D-Ivy, that would remove a federal antitrust exemption enjoyed by the health insurance industry since 1945.
The measure, the Health Insurance Industry Fair Competition Act, was passed Wednesday afternoon in a vote of 406-19. Perriello introduced the measure with fellow freshman Democratic Rep. Betsy Markey of Colorado.
Perriello said the bill would restore competition to the health insurance industry, improve quality, increase consumer choice and drive down costs for consumers.
“It moves us in the right direction to put patients and doctors back in the driver’s seat,” Perriello said in a speech on the House floor. “It allows us to restore the basic sense of competition in this country. And it says, for once, working and middle class families are going to come out ahead of the special interests. Consumers are going to come out ahead of the greed mentality.”
During his gubernatorial campaign, Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-VA) repeatedly criticized the Recovery Act, saying that although it was “massive,” he didn’t think it would “have a stimulus effect.” From the Virginian-Pilot in 2009:Republican Bob McDonnell is the lone critic [of the stimulus], saying “This bill contains significant categories of spending that may do little to help the economy.”
McDonnell has praised GOP congressional members who voted against the plan, saying the increased debt “is not going to be good long-term for America,” but he says he believes Virginia should collect its share of the stimulus anyway.
However, now that he’s in office and facing real budget challenges, he’s singing a different tune. On Monday, McDonnell proudly “announced that Virginia will receive a total of $24 million in federal funding to advance health information technology” — money made possible by the stimulus, which McDonnell conveniently failed to mention. McDonnell’s spokesman insisted that the previous governor, Democrat Tim Kaine, applied for the funds, but that didn’t stop McDonnell from touting them.
Yesterday, McDonnell went even further and asked for more stimulus dollars:
– McDonnell said he would “support Congress extending the federal stimulus bill to help states cover rising health care costs, a potential infusion of funds that Virginia lawmakers hope will help close a more than $4 billion budget shortfall.” He added that because Medicaid costs have “just grown so fast, until we have some federal health care reform that really addresses cost, if the federal government is willing to help us for a short period of time, that would be fine.”
– In a meeting at the U.S. Capitol, McDonnell urged the state’s congressional delegation to “help him secure stimulus funds to help build a Rolls Royce manufacturing plant in Prince George County.”
Apparently, McDonnell has concluded that the stimulus is now able “to help the economy.”
Read ThinkProgress’ report on the GOP’s stimulus hypocrisy here.
Whether you are a Democrat, Independent, or Republican, you have to be sick and tired of the "politics as usual" that has taken over South Carolina and our Nation.
In order to build a lasting foundation for America’s economic prosperity and security, we need to organize around the core challenges facing Americans and their families:
By acting together, we can overcome the obstacles that for too long have prevented real change on the critical issues the citizens of the First Congressional District face day in and day out.
Now is the time to leave behind the status quo and build support for real solutions. I ask you to join my campaign and begin the fight for the First Congressional District for real change!
What we don't need in Congress are more long tenured bureaucrats, professional politicians, or people looking to enhance their retirement to run for office.
CBO estimates that in the fourth quarter of calendar year 2009, ARRA added between 1.0 million and 2.1 million to the number of workers employed in the United States, and it increased the number of full-time-equivalent jobs by between 1.4 million and 3.0 million…CBO also estimates that real (inflation-adjusted) gross domestic product (GDP) was 1.5 percent to 3.5 percent higher in the fourth quarter than would have been the case in the absence of ARRA.
CBO calculated that without the stimulus package, the unemployment rate would be up to 1.1 percent higher. It also said that unemployment is higher than analysts predicted after passage of the ARRA due to “greater-than-projected weakness in the underlying economy rather than lower-than-expected effects of ARRA.”

Yesterday, the SC House Ways and Means committee adopted an amendment proposed by Representative Rex Rice banning state insurance plans from covering abortion IN EVERY CIRCUMSTANCE.
This is an unacceptable and heartless attack on women's access to healthcare, and we need you to speak out by asking the Chair of the committee, Representative Dan Cooper, to strip the amendment from the budget.
Click here to email Representative Cooper.
If the amendment is not removed, state employees will lose insurance coverage of abortion--which they currently ONLY have in cases of rape, incest, or when necessary to save the life of the woman. Attacking women's access to healthcare just to score political points is the worst kind of cynicism. Doing so in a year when families all across South Carolina are struggling to make ends meet is unconscionable.
Thank you for speaking out,
Jessica Bearden
Director of Public Policy - Planned Parenthood
When Tennant got up to speak, he started addressing Barber personally.“Let’s talk about the $21 million. You brought it up, so let’s talk about it,” Tennant said to Barber.
Barber objected by saying Tennant should have been addressing council as a whole.
“Brendon, you just brought my name up while I was sitting back there,” Tennant fired back.
Mayor Jack Scoville banged the gavel but then Barber told Tennant “you don’t want me to step from behind this podium.”
“Pardon me?” asked Tennant.
“You heard what I said,” Barber answered.
Tennant then left the room while saying he does not want to be involved in a situation where “a councilmember says something like that.”
I have a very simple request and it won't cost you a dime -- help us spread the word about our campaign to your friends on the internet.
“We all have a stake in the health of our nation’s children,” said Sebelius. “Exploring new technologies and initiatives will help ensure our kids get the high quality care they need and deserve.”
South Carolina's first-year award will be $2,214,263, with a five-year total of $9,277,361.
Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) Lobbied For Tens Of Millions In South Carolina Stimulus Funds. According to the Georgetown Times, a business coalition called the North Eastern Strategic Alliance worked closely with DeMint to secure millions in stimulus funds for the I-73 corridor highway in South Carolina. [Georgetown Times, 5/31/09]
-Senator DeMint Voted Against The Recovery Package Twice [Record Vote 59; Record Vote 60]
Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC): Would Be “Crazy” Not To Accept Recovery Package Money. During an interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, Graham was asked whether South Carolina should “take the [stimulus] money,” to which he replied, “I think that, yes, from my point of view, I — you don’t want to be crazy here. I mean, if there’s going to be money on the table that will help my state, but I’ve got a job to do up here, and that is to try to help people and not damn the next generation.” [CNN, 2/11/09]
-Senator Graham Voted Against The Recovery Package Twice [Record Vote 59; Record Vote 60]-Senator Graham Attacked The Recovery Package For Missing “The Mark A Long Way. We Increased New Government; We Did Not Increase New Jobs.” [ABC News, 2/15/09]
Brown, in a prepared statement, said the funding “has been a long time coming.”The representative, who will be leaving office in January, said I-73 has been one of his big concerns during his decade in Washington.
“I have worked my entire Congressional career towards making I-73 a reality and this grant is another important step in that direction.” said Brown.
No, Henry. If you want credit for the money being handed down, you need to admit it actually wasn't you who made it happen. It was your fellow Democratic colleagues who voted for the stimulus. You should be praising them. It was a long time coming... Thanks, Dems and Obama.
Rep. Henry Brown (R-SC) Lobbied For Tens Of Millions In South Carolina Stimulus Funds. According to the Georgetown Times, a business coalition called the North Eastern Strategic Alliance worked closely with Brown to secure millions in stimulus funds for the I-73 corridor highway in South Carolina. The Times also reported: “McGill noted that about a thousand to 1,200 people showed up at an appreciation dinner for U.S. Rep. Henry Brown, R-Hanahan, last week. They did that, McGill said, because ‘The man’s delivered for us. Our Congressional delegation has delivered.’ He credited Brown, Reps. Jim Clyburn and John Spratt, and Senators Lindsey Graham and Jim DeMint for working hard for South Carolina interests. ‘You’re talking about a one-two punch,’ McGill said. ‘Those fellows know how to deliver.’” [Georgetown Times, 5/31/09]
-Congressman Brown Voted Against The Recovery Package Twice [Roll Call Vote #46; Roll Call Vote #70]
| Bill # | Description | Sponsor | Position | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H 3199 | Behavioral Health Restructuring | Harrison | Oppose-As Am | Medical Affairs Committee |
| H 3305 | Combats Federal EFCA “card check” | Bedingfield | Support | Set for Special Order |
| H 3584 | Cigarette Tax | Harrell | Support | Senate Calendar |
| H 4282 | Prohibits Texting While Driving - trauma | D.C. Smith | Support-With Am | House floor |
| H 4538 | Establishes the SC Health Information Exchange (SCHIEX) | Crawford | Support | House LCI Committee |
| S 0424 | State Sovereignty, amended to oppose Federal healthcare reform | Bright | Oppose-As Am | House Returned to Senate |
| S 0642 | Prohibits Texting While Driving - trauma | Alexander | Support-As Am | Senate floor |
(The South Carolina Hospital Association puts together this information.)
On Thursday, February 25, the White House is holding a health care summit. (ALERT: President Obama has officially released his proposal for health care. To read more, click here.) Listed below are the Senators and Representatives who have been invited to the summit. This summit provides an opportunity for bipartisan conversation regarding this vital issue, and it is important that lawmakers from both sides of the aisle are present. Please call the Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121, ask to speak to your representative and encourage them to attend the summit. Here are some talking points to consider:
Here are the representatives that have been invited:
Senator Jon Kyl, R-AZ, Republican Whip
Representative George Miller, D-CA, Chairman of the Education and Labor Committee
Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA
Representative Henry Waxman, D-CA, Chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee
Senator Christopher Dodd, D-CT, Member of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee
Senator Chuck Grassley, R-IA, Ranking Member of the Finance Committee
Senator Tom Harkin, D-IA, Chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee
Senator Richard Durbin, D-IL, Majority Whip
Senator Mitch McConnell, R-KY, Republican Leader
Representative Steny Hoyer, D-MD, Majority Leader
Representative Dave Camp, R-MI, Ranking Member of the Ways and Means Committee
Representative John Dingell, D-MI, Chair Emeritus of the Energy and Commerce Committee
Representative John Kline, R-MN, Ranking Member of the Education and Labor Committee
Senator Max Baucus, D-MT, Chairman of the Finance Committee
Senator Harry Reid, D-NV, Majority Leader
Representative Charles Rangel, D-NY, Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee
Representative John Boehner, R-OH, Republican Leader
Representative James Clyburn, D-SC, Majority Whip
Representative Joe Barton, R-TX, Ranking Member of the Energy and Commerce Committee
Representative Eric Cantor, R-VA, Republican Whip
Senator Mike Enzi, R-WY, Ranking Member of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee
![]() | Homeland Insecurity ...Why new investments in children and youth must be a priority for the Obama Administration and the 111th Congress |


I had the privilege of speaking to the Conservative Political Action Conference yesterday.
As I joked in my speech, I didn’t come to Washington to make friends…and so far I haven’t been disappointed.
But the relationships I have built with so many freedom loving Americans are more valuable to me than any I could create in Washington.
I am thankful for the support that so many of you have offered to me, and I want to share this video with you.
Please take the time to click thru to my website and watch the video.
Sincerely,
Jim DeMint


Thank you for contacting me to express your support for S.1584, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2009. I appreciate hearing from you.
As you may know, Senator Jeff Merkley, of Oregon, introduced S.1584 on August 5, 2009. This legislation would make it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against any individual's actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity.
You may be interested to know that under existing laws, such as the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1991 and the Equal Opportunity Act of 1995, an employer is prohibited from discriminating against prospective or current employees based on non-conduct related activities.
Agencies, such as the Office of Personnel Management, have interpreted the prohibition of discrimination to include discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Currently, S.1584 has been referred to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. While I am not a member of this committee, please rest assured that should the legislation come before the full Senate for debate, I will keep your thoughts in mind.
Thank you again for sharing your views with me. Please feel free to contact me in the future with any issues important to you or your family. It is an honor to serve you and the people of South Carolina.
Sincerely,
Jim DeMint
United States Senator
EPI Vice President Ross Eisenbrey tracked monthly job loss data from the start of the recession until today.
The chart he assembled shows the most severe months of job loss occurred in the months immediately preceding the Recovery Act taking effect, when more than 700,000 jobs were being lost each month. The injection of Recovery Act investments into the economy brought an immediate and sustained reduction in monthly job loss tallies, he showed.
EPI President Lawrence Mishel made the same argument during a debate on PBS NewsHour, where he stressed that that monthly job losses were down to about 35,000 by the end of 2009. "This wasn't by accident," he said. Mishel added that the reason the jobs crisis remains severe is that "we were in a really deep hole." With unemployment projected to be around 8% two years from now - an unusually high level that was never even reached during the past two recessions - Mishel said we actually need to do much more to create jobs.
"All administrations - Republican or Democrat - in a recession tend to run deficits," Mishel said. "We have a huge deficit because we have a huge recession. A lot of people are out of work and are not paying taxes."
Economist Josh Bivens said that GDP data, like job loss data, offered more compelling evidence of the positive impact of the Recovery Act. During a podcast interview with The Nation editor Christopher Hayes, Bivens said that GDP patterns presented "a stark before-and-after picture." During the last quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009, GDP contracted at a 6% annual rate, the worst six-month decline on record. By contrast, in the second quarter of 2009, which included significant Recovery Act spending, GDP contracted by less than 1%. It has grown each quarter since then.
Hayes said Bivens offered "as clear an explanation of the effects of the Recovery Act as I've heard." Asked about the weakness of the Recovery Act, Bivens replied, "It goes away too quickly." Most Recovery Act spending will be completed by the middle of this year, a time when unemployment is projected to be near 10% and the country will still need 10 million additional jobs to return to pre-recession levels of employment.
Not all job creation efforts are created equal
This great need for more jobs means that any job creation effort adopted must be large enough for the magnitude of the current problem. Unfortunately, the job creation tax credit recently proposed by Senators Chuck Schumer and Orrin Hatch is insufficient. In an opinion piece published on EPI.org, W.E. Upjohn Institute economist Timothy Bartik argued that the Schumer-Hatch proposal has "several questionable design details." Bartik said that the proposal attempts to avoid some of the steep costs of tax credits for new hires, in part by limiting the credits to workers who have been unemployed for at least 60 days, and applying the credits only through 2010. "If we want to effectively encourage job growth through a tax credit, we need a program that tightly targets that goal with a large enough tax credit to affect employers' hiring decisions," Bartik wrote.